TaskFlow

Problem

Multi-tenant SaaS surfaces often drift when billing, teams, projects, tasks, and permissions are explored as separate feature islands instead of one product model.

Role

I use TaskFlow as a non-commercial product-systems reference for modeling tenant boundaries, shared workflows, and stateful product operations.

Decisions

• Treat teams, projects, tasks, billing, and events as connected product primitives.
• Keep permission-aware routing and reusable UI states visible in the architecture.
• Design screens around repeated operator actions rather than one-off marketing flows.

Outcome

The lab makes the product model and engineering tradeoffs visible without presenting the project as client work or production proof.

Boundary

TaskFlow is a source-available exploration, not a shipped client system. The useful signal is the modeling, workflow, and interface judgment behind the product surface.

Proof points

• Domain model covers teams, projects, tasks, billing, events, and automation.
• Reusable app patterns support repeated operational workflows.
• The surface frames platform decisions as product leverage, not only code organization.