Skip to main content

Services

Senior engineering services for clearer systems and safer delivery.

Architecture review, technical advisory, and implementation support for teams working through platform, commerce, CMS, performance, and release constraints.

Ways to work together

Review

Architecture Review

A focused audit of your frontend or product platform: structure, boundaries, delivery risks, and the changes that will create the most leverage.

$3,000 starting point

  • Codebase and architecture review
  • A prioritized remediation plan
  • A working session to align next steps

Expected outcomes

  • A written map of the current architecture, including ownership boundaries and high-risk coupling.
  • A sequenced remediation plan that separates quick wins from deeper platform work.

Best for: Teams about to scale a product surface, redesign a frontend foundation, or clean up a monorepo that is starting to fight back.

Advisory

Technical Advisory

Ongoing product and platform guidance for teams that need strong engineering judgment without hiring a full-time staff-level lead immediately.

$2,500 per month

  • Architecture and design reviews
  • Async guidance on implementation direction
  • Ongoing input on standards and system boundaries

Expected outcomes

  • Clear technical direction before the team commits to costly product or platform decisions.
  • A recurring decision loop for architecture, standards, accessibility, SEO, and delivery risk.

Best for: Founders, engineering leads, and teams working through product/platform tradeoffs in real time.

Sprint

Delivery Sprint

A fixed-scope implementation sprint for high-leverage work like navigation refactors, design system foundations, content delivery layers, or portfolio/platform restructuring.

From $15,000 fixed scope

  • Scoped implementation plan
  • Hands-on code and architecture changes
  • Verification and handoff notes

Expected outcomes

  • A shipped slice of implementation work tied to a clear business or delivery constraint.
  • Code changes that improve the system boundary instead of only patching one screen.

Best for: Teams that already know the problem and need a senior engineer to push through the actual implementation.

Capability clusters

These usually travel with the engagement, even when the first request starts with a narrower surface.

Platform Engineering

Full-stack product systems · API and data-flow boundaries · Internal tools and admin workflows · Maintainable architecture decisions · Documentation and handoff paths

Commerce and CMS Architecture

Storefront journeys · Checkout and order state · Content models and editorial workflows · SEO metadata and structured data · Localization and publishing operations

Performance and Release Reliability

Core Web Vitals · Regression coverage · CI/CD quality gates · Observability and runbooks · Safer release workflows

How engagements usually move

The work starts by making the actual constraint visible, then narrows into the smallest durable implementation slice.

Architecture Review

Process

  • Inspect route structure, shared packages, data flow, accessibility, SEO, and performance risks.
  • Review the most important product workflows with the team that owns the surface.
  • Turn findings into an implementation-ready plan with tradeoffs and first changes.

Outcome

  • A written map of the current architecture, including ownership boundaries and high-risk coupling.
  • A sequenced remediation plan that separates quick wins from deeper platform work.
  • Decision notes your team can use to align engineering, product, and design stakeholders.

Technical Advisory

Process

  • Set the decision cadence and the product surfaces that need advisory coverage.
  • Review proposed approaches, pull request direction, and architecture risks asynchronously.
  • Keep a running recommendation log so decisions remain visible after the engagement.

Outcome

  • Clear technical direction before the team commits to costly product or platform decisions.
  • A recurring decision loop for architecture, standards, accessibility, SEO, and delivery risk.
  • Practical written guidance that helps senior engineers move without adding process weight.

Delivery Sprint

Process

  • Define the narrowest high-leverage scope and the acceptance checks for the sprint.
  • Implement the changes directly in the repo with tests and reviewable checkpoints.
  • Document what changed, what remains risky, and what should happen next.

Outcome

  • A shipped slice of implementation work tied to a clear business or delivery constraint.
  • Code changes that improve the system boundary instead of only patching one screen.
  • Verification notes, follow-up recommendations, and handoff context for the owning team.